Why Trash Talking Sugary Food Makes You Want It Even More
In the primary study, people who read an antagonistic message about sweet had more constructive contemplations about these awful for-you sustenances than people who were presented to a constructive or impartial message. In the following study, health food nuts read either a positive or negative message about sugar-loaded snacks; then viewed a video while noshing on treats. The outcome: The negative-message bunch ate 39% a bigger number of treats than the individuals who read a positive message. Furthermore, in the last study, health food nuts who saw a message that recorded both the upsides and downsides of their snacks pick less horrible ones than weight watchers who read an entirely negative message.
"We think calorie counters expand their enthusiasm for and devour more undesirable sustenances in the wake of seeing uneven negative messages since they feel like their opportunity to control their nourishment decisions is debilitated," clarifies Nguyen Pham, one of the study's specialists. This is the reason Pham suggests utilizing a blend of positive and negative informing, for example, "Sweet tastes great, however is awful for my wellbeing"— to hold your utilization under tight restraints.
"Weight watchers don't see twofold sided messages about undesirable sustenances as a danger to their flexibility," she says. "Rather, they see these messages as giving considerably more opportunity of decision. Thus, they will probably consent to the messages and pick less horrible sustenances."
So whenever you are going to police your (or a companion's ) nourishment decisions, attempt this mental trap. It might simply give you the purpose you have to leave.
==>Why Trash Talking Sugary Food Makes You Want It Even More<==



No comments:
Post a Comment